Multiple Criteria Decision Making Penentuan Juara Lomba Roasting Kopi Menggunakan Multi-Attributive Border Approximation Area Comparison

Sanriomi Sintaro

doi:10.58602/jics.v2i2.16

Sanriomi Sintaro Universitas Sam Ratulangi

DOI: https://doi.org/10.58602/jics.v2i2.16

Keywords: Decision, MABAC, MCDM, Multi-Criteria, Roasting

Abstract

Multiple Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) is an approach used to evaluate and select alternatives based on several criteria or factors. The purpose of this study is to apply the Multi-Attributive Border Approximation Area Comparison (MABAC) method in determining the winner of the coffee roasting competition using criteria namely fragrance, flavor, aftertaste, acidity, body, sweetness, balance, and cup to profile. With the help of the MABAC method, it will make it easier for the competition committee to determine the winner of the coffee roasting competition. The ranking results using the final results of the MABAC method for rank 1 were obtained with a final score of 8,525 on behalf of participant William, rank 2 was obtained with a final score of 5,525 on behalf of participant Firman, and rank 3 was obtained with a final value of 2,525 on behalf of participant Aditya.

References

N. Sari and D. Cahyani, “Perancangan Sistem Informasi Monitoring Sertifikat Menggunakan Extreme Programming,” J. Ilm. Comput. Sci., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 1–6, 2022, doi: 10.58602/jics.v1i1.1.

F. H. Aminuddin, A. R. Riyanda, and T. Djauhari, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Penentuan Wali Kelas Berdasarkan Prestasi Guru Dengan Metode Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) Berbasis Web,” J. Media Inform. Budidarma, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 728–737, 2022.

V. H. Saputra and T. Ardiansah, “Penerapan Combined Compromise Solution (CoCoSo) Method Dalam Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Pemilihan Modem,” J. Ilm. Comput. Sci., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 7–16, 2022, doi: 10.58602/jics.v1i1.2.

R. Nuraini, Y. Daniarti, I. P. Irwansyah, A. A. J. Sinlae, and S. Setiawansyah, “Fuzzy Multiple Attribute Decision Making Menggunakan TOPSIS Pada Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Pemilihan Wireless Router,” JURIKOM (Jurnal Ris. Komputer), vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 411–419, 2022.

D. Handoko, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Pemilihan Kapten Tim Futsal Dengan Metode Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP),” J. Ilm. Inform. dan Ilmu Komput., vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 77–86, 2022.

L. Nababan, R. Daeli, D. Siregar, E. W. Ambarsari, and S. Fadli, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Rekomendasi Pengangkatan Karyawan Kontrak Menjadi Karyawan Tetap Menerapkan Metode Multi Objective Optimization on the Basis of Ratio Analysis (MOORA),” J. Informatics Manag. Inf. Technol., vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 35–45, 2023.

R. R. Oprasto, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Pemilihan Pemasok Bahan Baku Menggunakan Metode PROMETHEE,” J. Media Celeb., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 37–43, 2023.

Z. Wen, H. Liao, A. Mardani, and A. Al-Barakati, “A hesitant fuzzy linguistic combined compromise solution method for multiple criteria decision making,” in Proceedings of the Thirteenth International Conference on Management Science and Engineering Management: Volume 1 13, 2020, pp. 813–821.

D. T. Do and N.-T. Nguyen, “Investigation of the Appropriate data normalization method for combination with preference selection index method in MCDM,” Oper. Res. Eng. Sci. Theory Appl., 2022.

R. Arundaa and A. L. Kalua, “Implementasi Multiple Attribute Decision Making Dalam Pemilihan Distributor Terbaik Menggunakan Metode TOPSIS,” J. Ilm. Comput. Sci., vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 77–87, 2023, doi: 10.58602/jics.v1i2.9.

H. C. Sonar and S. D. Kulkarni, “An integrated AHP-MABAC approach for electric vehicle selection,” Res. Transp. Bus. Manag., vol. 41, p. 100665, 2021.

J. Wang, G. Wei, C. Wei, and Y. Wei, “MABAC method for multiple attribute group decision making under q-rung orthopair fuzzy environment,” Def. Technol., vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 208–216, 2020.

M. Zhao, G. Wei, X. Chen, and Y. Wei, “Intuitionistic fuzzy MABAC method based on cumulative prospect theory for multiple attribute group decision making,” Int. J. Intell. Syst., vol. 36, no. 11, pp. 6337–6359, 2021.

A. E. Torkayesh, E. B. Tirkolaee, A. Bahrini, D. Pamucar, and A. Khakbaz, “A systematic literature review of MABAC method and applications: An outlook for sustainability and circularity,” Informatica, vol. 34, no. 2, pp. 415–448, 2023.

J. Fan, R. Guan, and M. Wu, “Z-MABAC method for the selection of third-party logistics suppliers in fuzzy environment,” Ieee Access, vol. 8, pp. 199111–199119, 2020.

Z. Zulkarnain and Y. Hasan, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Pemilihan Peserta FLS2N SMAN 1 Perbaungan Menggunakan Metode MABAC,” KLIK Kaji. Ilm. Inform. dan Komput., vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 1–7, 2021.

S. R. Purba, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Pemilihan Dokter Terbaik di Dinas Kesehatan Kab. Simalungun Menggunakan Metode MABAC,” Pelita Inform. Inf. dan Inform., vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 129–135, 2020.

A. Ahyuna, B. Rahman, F. Nugroho, I. W. S. Nirawana, and A. Karim, “Analisa Penerapan Metode MABAC dengan Pembobotan Entropy dalam Penilaian Kinerja Dosen di Era Society 5.0,” Build. Informatics, Technol. Sci., vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 29–39, 2023.

M. D. Saefudin and A. Mirza, “Sistem Penunjang Keputusan Penilaian Guru Terbaik Dengan Metode Multi-Attributive Border Approximation (MABAC),” OKTAL J. Ilmu Komput. dan Sains, vol. 1, no. 06, pp. 609–619, 2022.