Peer Review Process

Authors should present their papers honestly without fabrication, falsification, plagiarism, or inappropriate data manipulation. Submitted papers are evaluated by anonymous referees for contribution, originality, relevance, and presentation by the editor-in-chief and associate editors. Besides, the articles will be evaluated on the suitability of aim and scope, language, writing grammar, template, and similarity. The Editor will inform you of the eligibility of your article as soon as possible.

Every submitted paper is independently reviewed by at least two peer-reviewers. This journal operates a conventional double-blind reviewing policy in which the reviewer's name is always concealed from the submitting author. Papers will be sent for anonymous review by at least two reviewers who will either be members of the Editorial Board and Reviewers or others of similar standing in the field. To shorten the review process and respond quickly to the authors, the Editors may triage a submission and decide without sending the paper for external review. The Editor’s decision is final and no correspondence can be entered into concerning manuscripts considered unsuitable for publication in this journal. All correspondence, including notification of the Editors’ decision and requests for revisions, will be sent by email.

Peer Review Stage :

  • The submitted manuscript is first reviewed by an editor for initial screening to the journal's aims and scope and similarity level by using the Plagiarism Checker or Turnitin.
  • These manuscripts will be sent to at least two reviewers anonymously by applying Double Blind Peer-Review.
  • Reviewers' comments are then sent to the corresponding author to take the necessary actions and responses.
  • The decision of the revised manuscript will be then evaluated in an editorial board meeting and the final decision who are sent to the corresponding author.
  • The reviewers will review the submitted article that follows the guidelines and template of the journal provided.
  • The review process in this journal employs a double-blind peer review, which means that both the reviewer's and author's identities are concealed from the reviewers, and vice versa.
  • In the review process, the article will be reviewed by at least two reviewers to ensure the quality of the article.
  • In the review process, the reviewers ensure the quality of the articles of their title, abstract, discussion, and conclusion. Besides, the reviewers also address the novelty and its contribution to the scientific discussion and verify the plagiarism and ethics of publication.
  • The reviewer also provides feedback on whether the article is accepted, rejected, or needs minor or major revision.
  • The time required for the manuscript review process from the reviewer's response is 6-8 weeks. The decision of the Editorial Team will be sent to the scriptwriter along with the results of the review from the Bestari Reviewer / Partner.
  • Manuscripts that have been revised can be resubmitted a maximum of 6 weeks from the time the revision has been given and attach the results of the articles that have been corrected into the system for further review directly to the Reviewer.